Agenda and minutes

Venue: Anglia Room, The Conference Suite, Elizabeth House, Dereham

Contact: Committee Services 

Items
No. Item

199.

Minutes (Agenda item 1) pdf icon PDF 122 KB

To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 26th November 2007.

Minutes:

The following corrections were made:

 

  • Minute No. 185/07: Minutes – on page 1, paragraph 2, line 1: corrected to read”……..the absence of Councillor Irving from this meeting…..”

 

  • Minute No. 192/07: Longham: Land at Bittering Quarry: Proposed continued extraction of minerals from land at Longham and extension of extraction area of Spreadoak: Reference 3CM/2007/0019/F – on page 7, paragraph 4, line 1: corrected to read”…….stated that Beeston with Bittering Parish Council had no objections…..”

 

The Minutes of the meeting held on 26 November 2007, as amended, were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

 

A Member had been very impressed with the way that the Minute had been written for the Swaffham application (Minute No. 194/07 refers).

 

200.

Apologies (Agenda item 2)

To receive apologies for absence.

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Messrs A Byrne, M Kiddle-Morris, F Sharpe and M Spencer.

 

201.

Declaration of Interest (Agenda item 3)

Members are asked at this stage to declare any interests they may have in any of the following items on the agenda.  The Members’ Code of Conduct requires that declarations include the nature of the interest and whether it is personal or prejudicial.

Minutes:

Members and Officers were asked to declare any interest as appropriate at the time the applications were made.

 

Mr P Daines, the Development Services Manager, declared a prejudicial interest in Agenda item 10 (Shipdham) and left the room whilst this item was being discussed.

 

Mrs S Howard-Alpe declared a prejudicial interest in item 5 of the Schedule of Applications (Attleborough) and left the room whilst this item was being discussed.

 

202.

Chairman's Announcements (Agenda item 4)

Minutes:

The Chairman advised the meeting of the procedures for public speaking.

 

The Development Services Manager informed the Committee that there would be a short ICT presentation at the end of the meeting concerning the proposed Document Management System.  Councillor A Stasiak and Mr K Rump, the Council’s ICT Project Manager, had asked for this item to be included on the Agenda as they had been keen to illustrate to Members how other Councils were dealing with electronic planning applications.

 

203.

Requests to Defer Applications included in this Agenda (Agenda item 5)

To consider any requests from Ward Members, officers or applicants to defer an application included in this agenda, so as to save any unnecessary waiting by members of the public attending for such applications.

Minutes:

The Development Services Manager announced that Agenda item 9 (Sporle/Swaffham) and item 4 of the Schedule of Applications (Yaxham) had been deferred and would come forward at the next available meeting.

 

204.

Local Development Framework (Standard Item) (Agenda item 7)

To receive an update. 

Minutes:

The Development Services Manager provided Members with an update on the Local Development Framework.

 

The Committee was reminded that the Policy Development and Review Panel 1 had been considering issues concerning the Core Strategy documents and the Development Control Policies. The report had been presented to the Cabinet meeting on 3rd December 2007 where the officer’s recommendations as detailed in the Cabinet report were approved subject to the documents relating to “Sustainability” being cross-referenced within the Core Policies. 

 

All Parish and Town Councils would be issued with a copy of the aforementioned document and the consultation process would continue from 28 January to 10 March 2008.

 

The Committee was informed of a number of meetings that Ward Members might wish to attend:

 

  • Two Parish Council briefings to be held in Dereham and Attleborough.
  • A special event for Local Service Centres would be held in Dereham.
  • A drop in session on the Growth Point in the Carnegie Rooms in Thetford.

 

All dates for the above events to be confirmed.

 

The Parish/Town meeting dates that had already been confirmed were as follows:

 

  • Mundford Parish Council – 3 January 2008
  • Old Buckenham Parish Council – 26 January 2008
  • Watton Town Council – 28 January 2008

 

The Planning Policy Team would also be in attendance at the Town and Parish Forum on 31 January 2008.

 

205.

Deferred Applications (Agenda item 8) pdf icon PDF 35 KB

To consider applications deferred at previous meetings including some, but not all, of those shown on the attached Schedule of Deferred Applications.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Swaffham: Land to the rear of the Conservative Club, London Road: 22 dwellings for retirement occupancy for Equity Holdings and Investments (Agenda item 8a)

 

Permission had previously been refused for 24 retirement dwellings on this site in September 2006 on grounds of overdevelopment, poor access and loss of the bowling green.  A subsequent appeal had been dismissed in March 2007 and the reasons for its dismissal had been on the loss of the bowling green and harm to the amenity of neighbouring properties.  The Appeal Inspector had concluded that the access arrangements were satisfactory, taking into account previous uses, and that the proposal would not result in an overdevelopment of the site.  In terms of amenity, the Inspector had focused on two neighbouring properties.  The applicant had since redesigned the building, and although two storey, the windows at the first floor were now in the form of roof lights to prevent overlooking and the windows facing the property to the East would be of obscure glazing.  The scale had been reduced and the building had been lowered therefore having a less imposing impact.

 

This new application, for 22 dwellings, had been deferred from the Development Control Committee meeting held on 15 October 2007 (Minute No. 167/06(i) refers).  The reason for its deferral was to enable additional information to be sought to the precise nature of the development, the provision of affordable housing and access arrangements.  This additional information had been submitted in support of the application.

 

In relation to the proposed use, the applicant had confirmed that the development would provide sheltered accommodation for the elderly, with an on-site warden and out of hours alarm call system and the development would be restricted to the over 60s.

 

The proposed development did not initially include affordable housing but instead the applicant had offered a financial contribution of £50,000 towards the provision of affordable housing elsewhere in the locality; however, since the production of the report, the applicant had offered a greater contribution of £60,000 or the provision of six shared equity units on the site.   Members were advised that if the provision of six units was accepted the contribution of £60,000 would be withdrawn.

 

Access to the site as currently proposed was via the existing drive onto Beech Close.  Consideration had been given to the possible use of an existing entrance onto London Street adjacent to the Conservative Club.  However, this access was considered as unsuitable for increased use given its restricted width and limited visibility.  No other alternative accesses to that shown in the application were currently available.

 

As far as the loss of recreational facilities was concerned, the applicant had also offered a sum of £40,000 towards a replacement facility elsewhere in the town.

 

Mr Wingate, the Applicant’s Agent was in attendance and reminded Members that the Planning Inspector had been considering a scheme for 24 units on the site. He pointed out that the Housing Enabling Officer had been happy with the applicant’s offer of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 205.

206.

Swaffham and Sporle: A Wind Energy development comprising of six turbines and associated works on land off Sporle Road: Reference: 3PL/2007/0314/F pdf icon PDF 77 KB

Report of the Development Services Manager.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

This item had been deferred to enable further information to be received from Ecotricity and the assessment of MOD representations (see Minute No. 203/07 above).

 

207.

Shipdham: Two Wind Turbines at land near Wood Farm: Ecotricity: Application No. 3PL/2004/0313/F (Agenda item 10) pdf icon PDF 55 KB

Report of the Head of Legal Services.

Minutes:

The Development Services Manager declared an interest in this item and left the room whilst this item was being discussed.

 

The Committee noted the chronology of events leading up to and since the Inquiries.

 

Following a great deal of technical legal argument, the application had now been referred to the same Inspector at a new Public Inquiry (for which no date had yet been fixed) to resolve the one issue only:  the potential impact of and means of controlling noise.

 

The Committee was now being asked to agree to enter into a Section 106 Agreement which aimed to control noise problems.

 

Tim Leader, the Deputy Chief Executive advised that noise would be a material consideration at the Inquiry.  Therefore it was important that the Council determined whether the draft standards set out in the Section 106 Agreement could actually be achieved at properties affected by noise from the turbines.  This would require acoustic experts to be commissioned to gather the relevant facts and model their implications.

 

In the Deputy Chief Executive’s opinion, a condition was much to be preferred because it would carry with it a more comprehensive, effective and more convenient enforcement framework.

 

Mr Hewett, the Ward Representative, thanked the Deputy Chief Executive for his views.  He and many residents had been pushing for a condition rather than a S106.  There had been public information provided by the residents own legal experts that a S106 could not be enforced.  Mr Hewett suggested that the matter be deferred until the pending Inquiry had run its course.

 

The Deputy Chief Executive advised that there would be no need to sign a S106 at this stage, before the Inquiry.

 

A Member felt that the Ministry of Defence (MOD) had been raising many issues recently for every wind turbine application and asked whether the Council had to take every one into account.  The Deputy Chief Executive explained that the Council was in an unfortunate position to refuse applications on third party representations.  If the MOD put its objections directly to the Council, this Council could ask for an indemnity for its costs.

 

Another Member stated that Breckland Council was still the Planning Authority and was obliged to take back the MODs concerns; he did not think that an indemnity would release the Council from the costs involved.  The Member asked the Officers if the absolute minimum noise level would be an adequate protection for those properties affected.

 

In response, the Deputy Chief Executive felt that the Council had two separate regimes that should protect people residing near windmills.  The first was the planning regime - Circular 11/95 set out what was deemed reasonable.  The second was the statutory nuisance regime.  Whether or not a planning condition was attached to the permission, if it was found that a statutory noise nuisance existed, the Council could then serve the applicant with an abatement notice. 

 

A Member felt that reasonableness was the problem, a condition could only be as good as the policing thereof and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 207.

208.

Snetterton: Proposed hotel/restaurant, The Flame Restaurant, Adjacent A11: Reference: 3PL/2007/1568/F (Agenda item 11) pdf icon PDF 79 KB

Report of the Development Services Manager.

Minutes:

The Principal Planning Officer (Major Projects) presented the report which concerned a planning application for a hotel/restaurant development adjacent to the Snetterton Heath employment area.  It had been recommended that the application be approved.

 

The application had been supported by a Design Statement, a Traffic report and a Needs Assessment.

 

The application site fell outside the Snetterton Heath Employment Area, as defined in the Local Plan.  Saved Local Plan Policy TRA.5 was considered relevant to the application.  Relevant national planning policy guidance included PPG 13 Transport, PPS 6 Planning for Town Centres and the Good Practice Guide on Planning for Tourism.  There was no national planning policy guidance specifically on motorist service areas, although draft guidance had been recently issued for consultation by the Highways Agency.

 

The proposed development would be accommodated in a series of interconnected one and two storey blocks of contemporary design.  Access to the development would be gained off an existing roundabout, linking directly to existing slip roads onto the A11.  Parking for 94 cars would be provided on site, together with a space for coach parking.

 

The main issues that were focused on were design matters and the layout of the proposed development.  These factors were considered to particularly important as the site would form the gateway to the employment area. The Principal Planning Officer (Major Projects) felt that the materials used would also be an important factor and would have to be conditioned.

 

The Parish Council had raised concerns with regard to the existing high pressure gas main that ran through the site, and that insufficient information had been provided about traffic; however, the Traffic Assessment that had been submitted had been found to be satisfactory.

 

Mr Askew, the Ward Representative, was in attendance and he supported the application in principle but had concerns about the growth of employment alongside the A11.  He felt that it was important that any growth should be carried out in a structural manner. Mr Askew also reiterated the Parish Council concerns about the existing gas main.  In response to these concerns, the Principal Planning Officer (Major Projects) advised that the Council would be providing a new planning framework for the Snetterton area within the LDF.  He further advised that this site could be considered in isolation as it sat on its own and there would not be any change to the general character of the use as the Flame Restaurant was already well established. The Chairman wished to point out that the site had been a former petrol station which she felt would have been slightly more hazardous than a hotel.

 

Planning permission had previously been granted in December 2006 (Minute No. 235/06(2) refers) for a 20-bedroom motel and restaurant.  The applicant had since acquired further land to enable expansion.

 

A Member asked questions about the roof materials as, in his opinion, the roof looked terribly bland.  In response, the Principal Planning Officer (Major Projects) advised that it would be a metal clad roof but the precise colour  ...  view the full minutes text for item 208.

209.

Schedule of Planning Applications (Agenda item 12) pdf icon PDF 355 KB

To consider the Schedule of Planning Applications:

 

Item No

 

Applicant

Parish

Page No

1

Next Generation Ltd

Swaffham

27

2

Mrs N Lond-Caulk

Caston

28 - 33

3

Mundford Poultry Ltd

Mundford

34 - 36

4

THPD Properties Ltd

Yaxham

37 - 42

5

R J Holbrook

Attleborough

43 - 44

6

Hastoe Housing Association

Ashill

45 - 47

7

Mr & Mrs D Leer

Snetterton

48

8

A Sacharczuk

Attleborough

49 - 51

9

Mr P Gilchrist

Attleborough

52 - 53

10

Mr Philip Hodson

Brettenham

54 - 56

 

Minutes:

a)            Item 1: 3PL/2007/0314/F: Swaffham and Sporle: Land off Sporle Road, Estate Office, Palgrave Farming Ltd: A wind energy development comprising of 6 wind turbines and associated works for Next Generation Ltd

 

This item was deferred (see Minute No. 203/07 above).

 

b)            Item 2: 3PL/2007/1420/F: Caston: Allcrest, The Street: New development of 4 dwellings with garages to replace existing dwelling for Mrs N Lond-Caulk

 

Approved, as recommended subject to a slab level condition being included.

 

Members were made aware that ten objection letters and four letters of support had been received.  Mr Rogers, the Ward Representative had also submitted a letter in support of the application.

 

c)            Item 4: 3PL/2007/1493/F: Yaxham: Former Breckland Garden Centre: Development of a ‘lodge park’ within the site of the former garden centre and re-use of ex camping and caravan site for THPD Properties Ltd

 

This item was deferred at the request of the applicant (Minute No. 203/07 above).

 

d)            Item 5: 3PL/2007/1510/F: Attleborough: Swangey Farm, Swangey Lane: Retention of existing two-story garage building and use of first floor as one bedroom annexe accommodation for R J Holbrook

 

Note: Mrs S Howard-Alpe declared an interest in this item and left the room whilst this item was being discussed.

 

Refused, contrary to the recommendation and enforcement action be authorised to re-instate the building to the original plans; the time for compliance being six months.  The reasons for refusal were on the grounds the design and bulk of the building was not acceptable, particularly in relation to the main house.

 

Planning permission had been sought for the retention of an existing garage building as built (given that it had been constructed larger than the previously approved scheme and with slightly different fenestration) and the use of the first floor area as annexe accommodation for the applicant’s elderly parents, rather than a playroom area, as previously approved.  On close examination it was concluded that the differences between the approved scheme and that proposed were significant.

 

The Chairman highlighted the differences between the original plan of the existing two-storey garage building and what had been built.  She felt that this garage building could end up as another house in the countryside.  It was pointed out that the applicant already had an existing barn not far from the farmhouse that was currently being used for residential use.

 

e)            Item 6: 3PL/2007/1527/F: Ashill: Site off Dunnetts Close: Low cost housing development scheme for 12 dwellings for Hastoe Housing Association

 

Following a proposal to approve the application, the vote was lost and the application was refused as recommended.

 

f)              Item 7: 3PL/2007/1568/F: Snetterton: Flame Restaurant, Newmarket Road (A11): Proposed demolition of existing building and redevelopment to provide restaurant, hotel, car parking and landscaping for Mr & Mrs D Leer

 

This item was considered in conjunction with Agenda item 11 (see Minute No. 209/07 above)

 

g)            Item 9: 3PL/2007/1718/F: Attleborough: Rear of 117 and 119 Hargham Road: Erection of bungalow and double garage for Mr P Gilchrist

 

Approved, contrary to the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 209.

210.

Enforcement Items (for information) (Agenda item 13) pdf icon PDF 70 KB

Minutes:

This item was noted.

 

211.

Applications determined by the Development Services Manager (For Information) (Agenda item 14) pdf icon PDF 112 KB

Report of the Development Services Manager.

Minutes:

This item was noted.

 

212.

Appeals Decisions (for information) (Agenda item 15)

APP/F2605/A/07/2045567: Swaffham: The Coach House, 23 Station Street: Appeal against a refusal to grant planning permission for Mr and Mrs R Chapman.  Application reference: 3PL/2006/1622/F

Decision: Dismissed

 

APP/F2605/A/07/2050447: Carbrooke: Site adjacent to Fen Farm, Willow Corner: Appeal against a refusal to grant planning permission for Dawe Estates Ltd: Application reference: 3PL/2007/0661/F

Decision: Dismissed

 

APP/F2605/A/07/2051427: South Lopham: Brick Kiln Lane, Low Common Road: Appeal against a refusal to grant planning permission for Mr Alan Powley: Application Reference: 3PL/2007/0405/F

Decision: Dismissed

 

APP/F2605/C/07/2040848: Bawdeswell: Wood Farm, Reepham Road: Appeal against an enforcement notice for Mr Stephen Martin Vince: Application Reference: ENF/2006/0536

Decision: Enforcement Notice upheld subject to variations

Minutes:

This item was noted.

 

213.

Additional Item - Document Management System

Minutes:

Members of the Development Control team had been invited to attend for this item.

 

Kevin Rump, the Council’s ICT Project Manager and Aileen Carlisle, a Planning Consultant, provided Members with examples of Document Management Systems currently used by other authorities, one of which was Gateshead Council.

 

Through this Document Management System the public were able to view submitted application forms, drawings and attachments, view appeal details, comment on current applications, track the process of applications, view reports on decision notices and find property information via a map based search.  Gateshead Council use the Comino System and was the first website out of all the sites visits that were carried out, that allowed the public to be able to view and take measurements of the plans on line.

 

Breckland Council’s aim in producing such a system, although being of a similar view, would aim to reduce the amount of clicks to search for planning applications.  All plans would be scanned and would include the measuring tool.  There would be a folder available which would contain all of the Council’s development plans.  Scanning could be carried out either in-house, by employing temporary staff, or by outsourcing the work; however, with either option, the Council would have to look at the risks involved and therefore further investigations would be carried out.

 

Tandridge Council’s website was also viewed.  This website had a facility that enabled the public to find exactly what was available in the area; for example where all the recycling banks were.

 

Mr Rump felt that the system would be a major step forward for Breckland Council and he was keen to have the facility up and running by April 2008.  He pointed out that Breckland, through expansion of the Comino system, would have the ability to be used as a Document Management System for other areas such as Finance.

 

A Member asked how much of the applicant’s personal information would be available on-line as she was concerned with data protection.  In response, the Committee was advised that the software that would be installed would sit with a Redaction software package that would automatically blank out personal information; this was in line with the Data Protection Act.

 

In response to a question concerning the current work flow system, Mr Rump advised that there would be a workflow package module as part of the purchased system but it would be sensible to come back to this after successfully implementing the system.

 

A Member asked the ICT Project Manager whether the development of virtual realities of cities and towns could be kept in mind.

 

The links and how to access the site were provided as follows:

 

http://planning.gateshead.gov.uk/publicaccess/tdc/tdc_home.aspx

1) Go to application search

2) Enter dc/07/00001 under the application reference field, click search

3) Press the “Click to view” button

4) Click on the tab “associated documents”

5) Click on the “View Associated Documents” button

 

This will take you into the Comino/Civica Document Management System where you can then view documents related to that  ...  view the full minutes text for item 213.