Issue - meetings

New Publicity Code

Meeting: 05/04/2011 - Cabinet (Item 32)

32 New Publicity Code (Agenda item 7) pdf icon PDF 81 KB

Report of the Executive Member for the Environmental Wellbeing & Communications Portfolio (Kay Fisher).

Additional documents:


The Marketing & Communications Officer presented the report which advised Members of the implications of the New Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity and recommended a decision regarding the future frequency of issues of Breckland Voice.


The Publicity Code provided guidance on the content, style and cost of local authority publicity.  Authorities were required by law to consider the Code in coming to any decision on publicity of any form addressed to the public.


A consultation with local authority organisations on a draft revised Code closed on 10 November 2010.  Over 350 responses had been received from organisations and individuals.  Breckland Council had contributed to the consultation.


Breckland Council’s publicity reflected the recommendations within the new Code with the exception of the recommendation around the frequency of Council publications.  Under the section relating to ‘Appropriate use of Publicity’ the Code stated that “Where local authorities do commission or publish newsletters, newssheets or similar communications, they should not issue them more than quarterly.  Breckland Voice was currently published six times a year.


Breckland Council currently published 62,000 copies of Voice which were distributed through Royal Mail to all businesses and residents in the Breckland area; it was the only publication in the District that reached everyone.  Whilst Voice was the primary means of communicating with our residents, digital media was a growing opportunity and had to be considered, however, access to the internet was difficult in some areas and some people preferred to use more traditional methods.  Resident’s opinions were constantly monitored through surveys carried out by the Citizens Panel which showed that they were very satisfied with the publication.


Although not a significant income stream, local businesses did have the opportunity to advertise in Breckland Voice and cutting the number of issues would result in bigger challenges to deliver timely communications.  The current publication schedule was timed very carefully to fit into key dates in the year. Publishing fewer issues would also increase the pagination resulting in higher printing costs eating into any savings made.


The Executive Member for Corporate Development & Performance supported the proposal for six editions.  He pointed out that reducing the publication to four a year would mean that much of the information, by the time Voice had been issued, would be out of date. He felt that Breckland Council already complied with the Code’s criteria in relation to style and content and the public’s satisfaction depended on the quality of the information the Council publicised.


The Vice-Chairman agreed with the aforementioned comments and added that Breckland did not have the benefit of widespread coverage of broadband.


The Executive Member for Economic & Commercial said that although Norfolk had the Eastern Daily Press many villages in Breckland did not have the facilities to deliver newspapers to the door and for elderly people Voice was the only publication that was widespread.  He mentioned the fact that two of his villages in his Ward did not have broadband facility.


The Executive Member for Environmental Wellbeing & Communications stated that the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 32